Climate Change is the Linchpin to the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset
The World Economic Forum's Great Reset is based on a fake foundation of the manufactured climate change agenda. Guy Mitchell, author of Global Warming the Great Deception, discusses different scenarios where research has revealed data that is the opposite of the globalists’ global warming/climate change narrative. One of the biggest variables used in their scare tactic strategy is using CO2.
In my new book, Soul-less Society, I discuss not only how the CO2 push been going on since the 1940s, but how they've actually been pumping more CO2 into our atmosphere since that time with cloud seeding.
One of the things I noticed recently, and maybe you have too, is if you shop on Amazon, do you notice when you're in the checkout process, they'll say, do you want it shipped tomorrow or in two days? Or if you wait until the next delivery day, they will give you money back. I think this the precursor to get people used to the idea of accumulating “carbon credits” and I believe this is how they will slowly move toward the carbon credit system. In other words, if you do this and modify your behavior, we will give you some extra tokens—or in this case—cash!
[***If you don’t like to read, watch video here: https://rumble.com/v3v6y5a-climate-change-is-the-linchpin-for-the-world-economic-forums-great-reset.html]
This is part of what will be the technocracy, the technocratic system in which all is based on tokens or credits and energy consumption, rather than on the cash system. In a radio interview, Patrick Wood and I talked about technocracy and how the sustainable development movement and climate change is linked to all the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset for our lives.
Guy Mitchell’s website shows exhibits that reveal results from scientific research as it relates to climate. In one exhibit that focuses on the lower boundary of our stratosphere called the troposphere, (from the earth’s surface to a height of up to 6.7 miles in the air) they calculated the average of twelve monthly average temperature readings for the lower troposphere and calculated the variance of that calculation from the annual temperature anomaly from the base period. They gather all this data via satellites, and the data is then analyzed by scientists at the University of Alabama, Huntsville. They found, from the period of 1979 to 1998, there were several cooling periods. And from 1989 to 2009, an overall cooling trend was observed.
And then finally, from 2020 to present, there still has been a cooling trend – and what I found interesting is that during that period, based on the lower troposphere—CO2 levels increased from 335 parts per million to 420 parts per million. They found that during cooling, the concentration of CO2 in that lower atmosphere increased.
Does that mean that CO2 levels are not necessarily indicative of a warming atmosphere? Because if the concentration of CO2 has actually increased during this cooling period, then that would negate the man- made global warming hypothesis, rendering it null and void.
While the mainstream narrative says that we've got this increase of CO2 and it's man made because of manufacturing and because of cows breaking wind and other ridiculous notions, Mitchell’s findings negate all of this. The facts show increase of CO2 doesn't necessarily mean you're going to have a warmer climate. They've built this narrative over the decades and you also have to ask yourself, why did they go from the words “global warming” to “climate change?”
Is it because they were having a tough time proving this?
Mitchell published a graph that showed the minimum amount of sea ice in the Antarctic. It displayed sea ice extent by year for the periods 1979 to 2020 in square kilometers, bringing back memories of Al Gore's deceptive documentary on global warming, where they were showing ice caps melting and polar bears trying to hold on for dear life, sending viewers the message that this surely was a sign of global warming.
The graph showed that “the lowest yearly sea ice extent stayed relatively constant at about 3 million square kilometers for the period 1980 to 2010 and in 2011 to 2017, there was an increase in the minimum sea ice extent, followed by a return to the 1980 to 2010 average”.
It concluded that “from 1980 to 2020, CO2 levels in the troposphere rose from 338 parts per million to 414 parts per million, while Antarctic sea ice extent remained stable. The levels of CO2 in the troposphere had no effect on the Antarctic sea ice, falsifying the man made global warming hypothesis.” Why didn’t the increase in CO2 levels decrease the sea ice extent?
As the New World Order group of elites continue to insinuate that the amount of Antarctic sea ice is quickly dissipating, these results say they are relatively constant in recent periods—going against their narrative.
Also, notice what the globalists don't tell you—they select hand-picked scientists they conveniently back with money, to get them to sign onto the false science and then get them to write papers and publish research results that gives them the outcomes they need to prop up their narrative.
They need these false claims about man-made climate change in order to get the people to willingly change their lifestyles and ultimately go along with the new controlled money system, bringing man down to the lowest common denominator.
Climate change in the linchpin they need to push the people into the WEF’s Great Reset.
Guy Mitchell Jr., Global Warming: The Great Deception
Read more about the Great Reset in my book, Soul-less Society: The Ultimate Deception That Took The Land of Plenty to A Nation of Death
#NWO #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #WorldEconomicForum #SustainableDevelopment #Agenda2030